Amendment 3 sounds like a deal, but Floridians should look twice 

Everyone loves a deal. And on the surface, Florida’s Amendment 3 looks like a great one. A bigger homestead exemption? Lower property taxes? Reduced monthly mortgage escrow payments? For homeowners, it’s easy to see the appeal.

But every “too-good-to-be-true” deal has a catch — and Amendment 3 is no exception.

Yes, if you own your home, your property tax bill will likely drop. But the savings come with a cost that every Floridian will feel whether they own or rent. The truth is simple: Amendment 3 shifts billions of dollars away from local governments, and when that revenue disappears, the services we rely on every day will shrink with it.

And that’s where the real story begins.

When you dial 911, will help arrive as quickly? Lower property taxes mean lower funding for emergency services. Cities across Florida, including Broward County, will face freezes in hiring, delays in replacing aging equipment, and reduced overtime availability for EMS and fire rescue. That shortfall translates directly into slower response times. A cheaper tax bill is nice. But when a loved one is having chest pain, or when a fire breaks out, “nice” won’t matter. Response time will.

Homeowners may save money, but families will lose access. If you’re a homeowner, you may enjoy more disposable income. But your children will see fewer opportunities, including parks with reduced hours, community centers cutting programs, libraries scaling back staff and events, even youth sports losing access to lighted ball fields. Night games? Not anymore. When the budget disappears, the lights go out after sundown.

Renters get nothing — except higher costs. Renters receive no direct tax relief under Amendment 3. None. In fact, they may see rent increases as landlords pass along rising costs from non-homestead properties. And as lower property taxes give buyers more purchasing power, home prices could rise, pushing renters further away from homeownership and deeper into the “forever renter” cycle. Amendment 3 helps homeowners. Renters? They’re left behind.

Seniors and youth will feel the cuts first. Florida’s senior population is growing rapidly, and many rely on municipal programs for social connection, transportation, recreation and mental health support. When cities lose revenue, these programs shrink or disappear. Seniors, especially those living alone or on fixed incomes, will feel the loss immediately. Students, who depend on free summer camps, donated school supplies, after school snacks and other support, will see those services disappear.

Sanitation, policing and public works will slow down. Property taxes fund the basics, such as trash pickup, street repairs, flood mitigation, police patrols and stormwater management. When revenue drops, cities must cut back. Broward residents will see slower repairs, fewer patrols and reduced maintenance, especially in neighborhoods already struggling with infrastructure challenges.

New fees and assessments are coming. Cities cannot operate without revenue. When property taxes fall, municipalities turn to alternatives, such as special assessments, stormwater fees, fire rescue fees, utility surcharges and service charges. These fees hit everyone, homeowners and renters alike. So yes, your property tax bill may shrink. But your monthly fees will grow.

Amendment 3 is marketed as a deal. But the truth is far more complicated. Homeowners will feel relief. Renters will feel pressure. Everyone will feel the ripple effects of reduced local government revenue.

Lower taxes sound great, until the services you depend on begin to fade. Amendment 3 gives with one hand and takes with the other. And what it takes may matter far more.

Such a deal? I don’t think so.

Kim Saiswick, EdD, RN, LMCH, is a long-time health care executive, patient and public health advocate, and nurse. She currently serves as a board chair of the South Florida Hunger Coalition. She lives in Plantation.

Read the full Opinion Editorial on the South Florida Sun-Sentinel